The Chinese Banker Internet Scam Ploy

 They are the deranged and the oblivious. No matter how many times that we ignore them or ridicule them, they keep coming back for more in the desperate attempt that maybe this time, we'll pay some attention to them. But then again, they are pretty stupid. I speak, of course, of the vile buffoons otherwise known as homo sapiens spammeritis annoyingus. Otherwise known as internet scammers and spammers. The following crap recently turned up in my email.

Hello Dear,

I am Mr. Chung Zhao, I work with a bank here in China as head of the audit department. During our bank general end of year account auditing, I discovered an overdue funds sum of USD19,500,000.00 (Millions)US Dollars belonging to my late bank customer who died over 10 years ago leaving no body to inherit his funds.

 
I am contacting you so that we may have an agreement/proper arrangement. note 50% of the sum will be for you while the other 50% will be my share as well.


I will be waiting for your quick response in order to update you with full detail and be informed that this deal will be executed legally.


Yours Sincerely,
Mr. Chung Zhao.

Where to begin? Well, with the start. "Hello Dear". A term of endearment that's a hallmark of the scammer trade. And rather unwelcome, mind you. This is a complete stranger, and second, I don't like being called dear.

Then we see the other hallmarks. Spacing issues in words and sentences. Capitalized words that shouldn't be capitalized. The inability to write money sums without screwing up.

This Chinese banker claims they've found an account of 19.5 million dollars that's essentially been ignored for the last ten years. 

To which I say nonsense. No banker would ignore an idle account of that number for that long.

They propose an illegal scheme of splitting it up fifty fifty. Again, nonsense. Because an actual banker of shaky ethics (99.5 percent of bankers, in other words) would be figuring out ways to keep that money for themselves. 

They want you to believe they'll share the loot with a complete stranger on the other side of the planet. But there is no loot, because there is no 19.5 million dollars. It's a scam, and the only money changing hands is that of the dumbass mark paying the inevitable admin fees before realizing that they got suckered.

Nice try, whoever you are. But I think we've established at this point that I'm wise to your ways and see you for the reprehensible sleazebags that you are. As is often mentioned, maybe you'll have better luck with someone else on that long list of half a million random email addresses you sent this too.

 Honestly, man, if you can't go make an honest living in this world, well, there's only one thing for you.

Go play on one of these things while it's doing that. Blindfolded.

The Curse Of The Unwanted Spam

 

It never ends, does it? The inevitable onslaught of spam and scam email, the nonsense comments of a nobody across the world desperately trying to lure you to their page focusing on Thai sports betting, for instance. Not interested, get lost, and go to hell. No matter how many times we ridicule them, they never take the hint. Because instead of just doing the world a favour and throwing themselves off a bridge, they keep doing this.

A few days ago I received this email, with the header Partnership Inquiry. Read for yourself. Try not to get a headache doing so.

Hello,

Can I still reach you at this email address?

Regards,
Any person receiving this email and any attachment(s) contained, shall treat the information as confidential and not misuse, copy, disclose, distribute or retain the information in any way that amounts to a breach of confidentiality. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies of this email from your computer system. As the integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed, neither PT Bank BRI shall be responsible for the contents. Any opinion in this email may not necessarily represent the opinion of PT Bank BRI.

Any person receiving this email and any attachment(s) contained, shall treat the information as confidential and not misuse, copy, disclose, distribute or retain the information in any way that amounts to a breach of confidentiality. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies of this email from your computer system. As the integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed, neither PT Bank BRI shall be responsible for the contents. Any opinion in this email may not necessarily represent the opinion of PT Bank BRI.

Well, let's see. They did reach me at my email address. Along with the half a million other random email accounts they sent it to. The important part is not clicking on anything, and definitely not replying. As tempting as it might be. No, I'll just reply by taking them apart here, as I always do.

Well, they write in that overly formal way, trying to present themselves as business-like, but someone from an actual bank would probably not make the cardinal mistake of writing the same paragraph twice.

Assuming they're not day-drinking.

While we don't see a lot of the curious wording and misspelling that is so common of spammers and scammers, it's still a scam. Sent at random to a half million email accounts or more. Proposing a partnership venture in the header but not saying anything of real substance in the body of the email. A random email out of the middle of nowhere.

A check confirms that there's an actual PT Bank BRI out there. 

In Indonesia.

Halfway around the bloody planet.

Rest assured, I have no interest in doing business in Indonesia, and doubt I'll ever visit the place.

I'm not a businessman, for one thing.

And this isn't a legitimate business venture.

Because real bankers don't send out random emails to people they've never met or corresponded with before.

Nice try, dumbass. But I'm wise to your ways and can see a scammer coming from kilometres away.

Perhaps someone else on that list of hundreds of thousands of emails will be gullible enough to bite and wind up losing a few thousand dollars before they realize they were taken for a ride.

But not me.

Why don't you just do the world a favour?

And take a swim with some piranhas?

Small Heroes And Big Stakes

“Nothing can prepare you for what’s coming.” ~ Ava

“Hiya, champ, how was school today?” ~ Hank Pym

“Thanks to you, we had to run. We’re still running.” ~ Hope Van Dyne

“I do some dumb things, and the people I love the most- they pay the price.” ~ Scott Lang

In 2015, Ant-Man gave the Marvel cinematic universe a different perspective, bringing in characters established in the comics and creating new ones in what was a light hearted sort of heist film. Now director Peyton Reed returns with the lead actors and a formidable new antagonist to another chapter in the small sized hero element of the Marvel world in Ant-Man & The Wasp, set in between Captain America: Civil War and the more recent Avengers Infinity War.

The film picks up threads from the previous film, with the disappearance of Janet Van Dyne (Michelle Pfeiffer) into the microscopic quantum realm while on a mission. Former criminal Scott Lang (Paul Rudd), as Ant-Man had entered and returned from that realm, giving hope to Janet’s husband Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) and daughter Hope (Evangeline Lilly) that it might be possible to find and save Janet. Scott’s participation in the superhuman dust-up that was part of Civil War leads to a parting of the ways, as Scott ends up on house arrest and Hank and Hope go into hiding. Two years later, Scott’s nearly finished his parole term after receiving a cryptic message from the quantum realm, and fate draws him back into the orbit of Hank and Hope, all while other players play into unfolding events.

With the success of the original film, of course there was going to be a sequel. Leading man Rudd is credited as one of the writers, along with four others, usually a sign of trouble when it’s writing by committee, though that’s not the case here. Chris McKenna, Erik Sommers, Andrew Barrer, and Gabriel Ferrari are also credited, and the script that results builds on what’s come before and takes things in new directions. That includes the light hearted humour and earnest charm of Rudd, the family dynamics moving into new directions for the Pym-Van Dyne clan (from estrangement in the first film to a common purpose), and the fantastic elements of microscopic worlds that the premise opens up.

Where the first film was more of a heist and caper film, this blends in part action, part romantic comedy, and for good measure throws in a complex villain who turns out to be a real treat in the way she’s treated. The writing for the characters is what grounds the film, playing to the strengths of the actors and to where they’ve already come from, giving depth and nuance in each case. Most of those are already established characters, while introducing new ones who are familiar to comic readers. The film's stakes aren't as big, perhaps, as that of Infinite War, with its despotic antagonist, but more personal, a rescue mission to save a life, and perhaps more than one life.

Reed’s return to the director’s chair for this second installment brings back the same techniques of the first film. He proved in the first case that he could balance the work of actors on the one hand and the CGI and action on the other, and that continues here. Where the characters are the bedrock of the film, Reed’s work continues to succeed in making use of CGI where it’s needed, and pacing action sequences in a way you can follow. Concepts like rapid shrinking or growth, as well as a character who phases in and out of physical touch, are made use of in the right way.

The cast, both returning and new players, are welcome in their roles. Michael Pena, David Dastmalchian, and Tip “T.I.” Harris return from the first film as Luis, Kurt, and Dave, each of them Scott’s old criminal associates who have gone legitimate, and the characters are part comic relief, part indispensable and unlikely backup in a crunch. Pena’s Luis is a particular motor-mouth who never seems to know when to shut up, which is part of the fun of the character, but Luis is also a strongly loyal sort. Randall Park debuts in the role of FBI agent Jimmy Woo, a fixture in the comics for some time now; he’s given a different role as a fed overseeing Scott’s house arrest, and gives the character a suspicious wariness.

Walton Goggins has made a career of playing dirtbags, most recently in Tomb Raider, and the same applies here as he plays Sonny Burch, also a character drawn out of the comics, where he was a minor villain in the Iron Man books. The character certainly fills the sleazebag role, a dirty dealing black market criminal with more ambition than brains, sniffing around at an opportunity and not considering that he might be in over his head. The character isn’t remotely likable or sympathetic, but the actor certainly plays to that and seems to be having a ball, chewing the scenery as he goes along.

Laurence Fishburne debuts in the Marvel universe (having had played Daily Planet chief Perry White in two of the recent Superman films for DC) as Bill Foster, another figure from the comics. Here Foster is an old associate of Hank Pym, though the two have had a parting of the ways some years earlier and aren’t on the best of terms. Fishburne has the acting chops to go toe to toe with Douglas on a matter of ethical concerns, and that comes across in the film, but he also plays Foster as a man of great intelligence and fortitude, doing something that he feels is the right cause.

Hannah John-Kamen plays the primary antagonist of the film, a young woman with a distinct problem. Ava is her real name, and she has ties to other players in the story as the Ghost. She is a mystery when we first meet her, phasing in and out of reality, her condition unstable at the quantum level. For her, Pym’s technology may be the key to saving her life, so her actions are entirely understandable, and it also makes her sympathetic. Ghost is a longstanding character in the Marvel universe, something of a mix between villain and anti-hero, and the character has been gender-switched here from a man into a woman, but it’s not jarring at all- if anyone could be switched like that, it’s Ghost, whose real name in the comics has never been divulged. The look of the character fits with the comics generally, and the presence- the line between villain and anti-hero- the actress gives her makes her a compelling one, and I’d like to see more of her down the line.

Michelle Pfeiffer also debuts as Janet Van Dyne, the original Wasp from the comics, and from movie continuity, taking over the role that was seen briefly in the first film. She’s not around for a whole lot of the film, generally confined to the second half, but she brings the right touch to Janet- the strong survivor who’s somehow made it through decades of being shrunk down in the microverse (where’s the food down there?), the wife and mother who’s missed her family, and the hero who’s willing to help someone who might not deserve that help. Her take on the character is sympathetic and a welcome addition to the Marvel cinematic universe.

Michael Douglas returns as Hank Pym again, the original Ant-Man who’s spent years trying to make things right. In the first film he reconciled his differences with his daughter, and this time out it’s about finding a way to determine what’s become of his wife. Pym starts out in one place- justifiably irritated with Scott because of Scott’s involvement in the superhuman dispute that’s put his own work in jeopardy. As the film unfolds, the character has to set aside those differences for a greater good, and Douglas gives the character the right tone of exasperated and wary scientist on the one hand and a paternal quality on the other. With the latter, it’s pride in his daughter and a more reluctant pride where Scott’s concerned. Pym might be cranky (and even a bit of a jerk), but there’s a sort of father-son dynamic with Scott, and Douglas plays to that.

Having had teased the notion of Hope Van Dyne as the Wasp in the previous film, this time out the story puts her right in that role, and Hope’s look fits the character. Evangeline Lilly reprises her role as Hope, a new creation for the cinematic universe the first time out (though the comics do now feature a teenaged daughter for Pym named Nadia, created mostly because of the previous film). Where the first film had Hope estranged from her father and reluctant to work with a scoundrel ex-con like Scott, this film finds her at a better place with Hank, and trying to sort out differences with Scott over his decisions (she starts out justifiably angry with him). There’s a playful, romantic spark between Hope and Scott that the actors play off of, but the actress invests her character with strength, resolve, and a fearlessness that makes her come into her own.

Paul Rudd brings back his laconic charm as Scott Lang, the former convict who’s been hard at work trying to better his life. The first film brought him full circle in that respect (with a rather impulsive decision during Captain America Civil War leading to him messing up his life, even if it was with good intentions). We find him still making the effort to do right, even if it’s under house arrest and the only thing he can do right is to be a good father to his daughter Cassie. The film takes him beyond that, requiring him to put his legal status in peril for a greater good; his concern about being a responsible parent happens to also be the same personal quality that makes him want to do right by Pym and Hope. Scott is something of a regular person (which is how Rudd plays him), but he’s the sort who can rise to the occasion when needed, and proves to be resourceful and capable in and of himself.

Ant-Man & The Wasp continues the Marvel cinematic universe in the right way, investing itself in its characters, playing off a lighter tone but still with some dramatic weight. It’s self-contained and yet linked to the greater Marvel universe (as the credits sequences will show), and it’s fun and well-paced. The leading actors have the right degree of chemistry, and their antagonist is a welcome new addition to the Marvel universe, one who manages to elicit our sympathy just enough.

The Personal Life Of A Chief Executive

“I’ve known Bob Rumson for years. And I’ve been operating under the assumption that the reason Bob devotes so much time and energy to shouting at the rain was that he simply didn’t get it. Well, I was wrong. Bob’s problem isn’t that he doesn’t get it. Bob’s problem is that he can’t sell it. We have serious problems, and we need serious people to solve them. And whatever your particular problem is, I promise you, Bob Rumson is not the least bit interested in solving it. He is interested in two things, and two things only- making you afraid of it, and telling you who’s to blame for it.” ~ Andrew Shepherd

“Mr. President, I’m sure there’s an appropriate thing to say at this moment. Probably some formal apology for the nice ass remark would be in order. I just don’t quite know how to word it.” ~ Sydney Ellen Wade

“With all due respect, sir, the American people have a funny way of deciding on their own what is and what is not their business.” ~ A.J. MacInnerney

“Bob Rumson is the only one doing the talking. People want leadership, Mr. President, and in the absence of genuine leadership, they’ll listen to anyone who steps up to the microphone. They want leadership. They’re so thirsty for it they’ll crawl through the desert toward a mirage, and when they discover there’s no water, they’ll drink the sand.” ~ Lewis Rothschild

The American President is a 1995 romantic comedy from director Rob Reiner and screenwriter Aaron Sorkin. It tells the story of a widowed President trying to get a crime control act passed and manage the political minefield that is Washington, while getting involved with a lobbyist. The film has an outstanding cast, and an idealistic tone throughout. Its protagonists are sympathetic, while its antagonists, led by a senator who reminds me of Dick Cheney, are suitably Machiavellian. This is the sort of film that Frank Capra would have gotten into.

The film opens with President Andrew Shepherd (Michael Douglas) and his White House advisors preparing for re-election. His chief of staff and best friend A.J. MacInnerney (Martin Sheen) hopes that a crime control bill can be enough to ensure re-election. The president, a widower since the death of his wife three years earlier, is raising his daughter Lucy alone, and has a bit of a predicament: a state dinner is coming up, and his cousin, who was going to attend with him, has fallen ill.

Shepherd happens to meet Sydney Ellen Wade (Annette Bening) at a White House meeting. She’s a lobbyist for the environment, very outspoken, and the two find themselves intrigued by the other. He invites her to join him for the state dinner- and from there, sparks begin to fly of both a romantic and political nature as the unlikely relationship ends up becoming fodder for Republicans looking to unseat the President in the coming election.

The film’s origins started with another actor: Robert Redford mused on the notion of a presidential romantic comedy of sorts, and Sorkin was brought in to write the screenplay. While Redford withdrew from the project, Sorkin was perfect to write the story. He first came to prominence with the play that was adapted to movie status, A Few Good Men, and after this film he developed the television series The West Wing. Sorkin’s writing throughout shows a strong idealism in a profession- politics- that should be cynical. The cynicism tends to be confined to Republican politicians, so we see where his political beliefs lie. Sorkin’s writing in general is smart and highly character driven, and we see that here, from the leading characters to the supporting characters. The idealism of Sorkin’s script shows itself most strongly in the President’s speech late in the film- his authoritative message is something that could easily be applied to certain wannabe politicians these days.

Rob Reiner was a good choice as director. He had already done a mixture of film genres as a director before this one, including one of my personal favourites, The Princess Bride, and the aforementioned A Few Good Men. While he has a gift for comedy, he certainly knows his way around drama, and that shows itself here, as well as the way he brings out the best in actors. Reiner keeps the film paced smoothly-  there’s never a sense of the film slowing down. He brought together the right crew for the project- their work really pays off in the look of the set, for instance; the White House set built for the production looks like the real place, with a lot of attention to detail. The sense of idealism in the story is reflected as well by Marc Shaiman’s music score; the composer got an Oscar nomination for the music, fused with optimism and romantic themes.

The cast were brilliantly chosen- some of them went on to have roles in The West Wing, as one might have expected. Richard Dreyfuss is the only real antagonist of the story, playing the ambitious Republican senator Bob Rumson. His performance is that of a devious opportunist, seeking his own play at power, pulling strings and orchestrating those around him. Rumson is a weasel of a character, and ends up reminding me of a less evil Dick Cheney, utterly without principle or conscience. It’s easy to dislike the character- and one wonders if Dreyfuss was enjoying himself playing someone so totally unlike him.

Nina Siemaszko has a turn in the film as Sydney's sister Beth, supportive in her way, and the way she and Bening work together on screen conveys that sisterhood strongly. David Paymer is one of those character actors who has a wealth of roles to his credit, and an everyman, hangdog sort of look, which works well for him. He plays Leon Kodak, the Deputy Chief of Staff, giving the character a deadpan but smart sensibility. Samantha Mathis plays Jane Basdin, a personal aide to the President, coming across as organized and calm under pressure. Anna Deveare Smith, another character actor who you’ve seen in many roles, plays the press secretary Robin McCall with a slightly sarcastic feel. I particularly like her interaction with Michael J. Fox’s character.

Speaking of whom, Fox plays the senior advisor Lewis Rothschild with conviction. The character is principled and smart, and comes across as perpetually worried. He doesn’t back down from speaking his mind and argues for his position- in some ways the character is the most idealistic of the story, and Fox plays to that throughout the film.  Even if he doesn’t remotely look like the name Lewis Rothschild suits him.

Martin Sheen is ideally cast as the Chief of Staff. The actor would later play President Bartlett on The West Wing, and his take as A.J. seems to be a prelude to that role. A.J. is calm under pressure, wise and authoritative. I like that the character’s ever mindful of protocol- his best friend’s the president and yet he calls him Mr. President. Yet the way Sheen interacts with Douglas throughout comes across as a believable, decades long friendship.

Annette Bening made for a good choice as Sydney. The character’s outspoken (perhaps too much), intelligent, principled, and dedicated to her work. As capable she is in doing what she does for a living, she’s not above getting flabbergasted or flustered in a socially awkward moment. The actress, whose career work has tended to lean more towards drama, turns out to have a good comedic touch, and Bening has good chemistry with Douglas throughout the film.

Michael Douglas brings the sense of authority and gravity one would expect in a fictional President throughout the film. Andrew Shepherd is a man balancing principle and pragmatism- running a country means trying to work with people you don’t particularly get along with, and making difficult decisions, and Douglas brings that across in his performance. He also gives the character a dry sense of humour as well as poignancy, and the character proves to be likable as we get to know him.

Rob Reiner had a big hit with The American President. Well received by audiences and critics alike, the film certainly wears its idealism and political stance on its sleeve. It boasts a terrific cast, is funny and smart, and offers a refreshing alternative to the general nonsense that is the current election campaign.

Dodging Disaster And Being A Micro-Hero

Some links before getting started today. Parsnip had a Square Dog Friday and a mix of  photos. Eve had book recommendations. Krisztina had a guest writer with travel tips. Lynn had birds. Ivy had a Friday question. Cheryl had a post. And Mark had a weather story.

Today I've got myself a movie review.

The Marvel cinematic universe has been  around awhile, giving us epic films in a cohesive, connected world. Now that universe goes into a smaller direction with the release of Ant-Man, a film following two lead characters who have both worn the identity in the comics, and who, while very different in backgrounds, have some common ground. It's a lighter film with a good sense of humour that still plays to the strong characterization and history of the characters. Directed by Peyton Reed, who has a background in comedy, the film evokes the irreverent tone of last summer's Guardians Of The Galaxy while moving things into a very small scale indeed.

We first meet our hero Scott Lang (Paul Rudd), a thief with a tendency to break and enter and steal things- not quite your usual protagonist, but he's a charming sort of guy, and we get to like him regardless. His family life is a mess- he's trying to fix up his relationship with his young daughter Cassie, while his ex wife (Judy Greer) is now involved with a cop (Bobby Cannavale)- not the easiest thing for a crook to have to deal with. Scott is just out of prison, having second thoughts about his career choices- there has to be a better way to make a living, though he's still associating with criminals, including his former cellmate Luis (Michael Pena).

Scott crosses paths with Hank Pym (Michael Douglas), a scientist who's become something of a bitter recluse after losing control of his company. Hank can relate to the family difficulties- he's a widower whose relationship with his daughter Hope (Evangeline Lilly) is strained, but he sees something in Scott worth redeeming. He's worried about the use of technology he's invented- Pym particles, which can shrink things down to the small scale- being converted for darker uses. Darren Cross (Corey Stoll), the one time protege who supplanted him, has his own agenda for that technology. Pym asks Scott for his help- which involves suiting up in a special uniform designed to assist the human body adapt to that small scale, with a few other tricks for good measure.

The film has been in the works for years, and Edgar Wright (Shaun Of The Dead) was once tapped to direct, having had co-written a story with Joe Cornish. Wright left the project over creative differences, and screenwriter Adam McKay (along with cast member Rudd) polished the story. McKay's background is also in comedy, as is Reed's- Reed directed films like Yes Man and The Break-Up- the comedic background of both writer and director show itself in the way the film comes across. It establishes the characters and weaves them firmly into the Marvel cinematic universe. And while there is an irreverent, comedic side of things, there's also strong characterization, from the parallel father-daughter strained relationships to the villain who doesn't see himself as such. Reed shows a deft touch as a director- I like the way he stages break and enter scenes, and he can handle action well. He paces the movie well, keeping things moving briskly along.

There's a healthy dose of CGI in the film, but it serves the story well, and doesn't feel like CGI. A lot of that has to do with how Scott interacts with the world at insect level, and certainly the ants he interacts with (and learns to communicate with) feel like they're sharing the same space as him. It also reflects in the sense the audience has that we're down at that same scale- a stream of water, for instance, has the look of a tsunami wave. Gunshots fired into a model city have a catastrophic feel, as well, when one is the size of an insect, and the special effects crews do fine work in conveying that.

I like the production values of the film. Pym's personal lab reflects the man himself, a place of curiousities. It's a contrast with the corporate sleekness of his former company, no longer in his control. That contrast also reflects itself in the two different tech designed uniforms making use of Pym Particles in the film. The Ant-Man uniform has influences from the various comics designs over the years, and has a utilitarian look to it, something you'd expect out of a scientist- efficient and purposeful. The Yellowjacket design that ends up coming into the picture is something else- sleek, aggressive, dangerous, and militaristic. Both designs suit the film well.

The casting was well done. There are the requisite cameos that you would expect. Stan Lee turns up, of course; the Marvel co-founder and writer has been doing a lot of these cameos in films done by Marvel Studios for years, as well as films based on characters from Marvel but produced by other studios. There are also references and nods to the larger cinematic universe- each of which is a treat for those wondering how this would all fit into the larger frame of things. Michael Pena as Luis fronts a group of petty crooks- but these characters aren't the heavies, they're comic relief, and Pena certainly plays to that, garnering some of the laughs along the way.

Corey Stoll has the look of a don't mess with me tough guy mode as an actor, and I've seen him in a number of roles, often playing villains or cops. He's got a hard look to him, and it serves him well as Cross, who comes across as a double dealing underhanded executive. Cross is the sort of villain who doesn't think of himself that way- he doesn't see his lack of ethics for what it is. In his mind he's in the right, and the ends justify the means. That reflects itself in the Yellowjacket design, which expresses his aggressiveness. The shades of gray of the character make him a compelling villain, and it's a good twist on the Yellowjacket concept- in the comics, Yellowjacket is in fact an alternate codename for Hank Pym.

Evangeline Lilly has made quite an impression, from her role on the series Lost to her turn as an elf in two parts of The Hobbit trilogy. I like her take on Hope. The character is smart and can take care of herself- something that certainly shows itself in the film. Ideally she might be the better fit for the uniform as a superhero- but the state of things with her father take things in a different direction. The relationship is so strained that she's taken on the surname of her late mother, and there's a lot of resentment and estrangement between them. Hope's journey as a character in the film is about reconciliation, and Lilly really plays to that as the film goes along. I wouldn't mind seeing the character perhaps take after her mother- the Marvel cinematic universe needs a Wasp.

A lot of changes have been done in terms of bringing Hank Pym from the comics to the big screen. The character is a founding Avenger in the comics, but here he is a scientist with ties to S.H.I.E.L.D. in the past. Where he is brilliant but occasionally mentally unstable in the comics, here he's brilliant but a recluse. And the story has added about thirty years onto his age. The essence of the character remains the same: a gifted, smart man with a strongly grounded sense of ethics. I like how Douglas conveys that in his performance, while bringing across the elements of worry the character feels at having his technology misused, the strain of loss in his life, and the difficulties he has with his daughter. Douglas also adds just the right touch of dry humour here and there. Hank Pym's a wise character- and a very human one, and I got to like him a lot through the film. It's a terrific take on the character.

I got to like Paul Rudd through the film as well. I've only seen him in one previous project of note- a television adaptation of The Great Gatsby- as I have not seen his numerous comedies in the last few years (I have a deep aversion to Judd Apatow as a director- the man's like fingernails on a blackboard to me). Rudd brings a charming, affable quality to the role of Scott Lang, a reluctant hero who grows into the role (a reminder of Peter Quill in last year's Guardians). The character's struggling to be a better person, if only for his daughter's sake, and that's the sort of thing the audience can relate to and root for, and Rudd brings that across in his performance. His initial status as a crook reminds me of George Clooney playing Danny Ocean- a disarming scoundrel with a plan. A reluctant hero he might be, but Lang does rise to the occasion in doing the right thing, and Rudd's portrayal takes the character through that journey.

Ant-Man is a new look at the Marvel cinematic universe that gives the audience fresh ground to cover while maintaining enough connections to the larger continuity. It's got a good sense of humour, likable lead actors who flesh out their characters in the right way, a very human heroine, and an underhanded antagonist with a mean streak. The film is an oddball kind of film- which makes it all the more appealing. I enjoyed it- and I look forward to seeing more of these characters down the line.