Every summer it seems there are endless popcorn films that
don’t make you think- aside from how preposterous that whole thing you just saw
was. It’s heavy emphasis on action, no
emphasis on logic. Usually one of them can be described best as the Big Dumb
Summer Movie, and usually it's one of Michael Bay's Transformers abominations. This year the title falls to Skyscraper, which could have easily
been titled Die Hard In The Towering Inferno, or The Physically
Impossible Crane Jump Shot. A derivative action thriller that pretty much
messes around with both terrorist and disaster film franchises and doesn’t do so nearly as well, it gives
Dwayne Johnson a chance to growl at everything (again) and throws concepts like
sense, physics, and gravity right out the window. Of a very high building.
A prelude establishes Will Sawyer (Johnson), an FBI hostage
rescue team leader, and a botched crisis results in his retirement, what with
losing the better part of a leg and all, when it doesn’t go according to plan.
Years later he’s married to Sarah (Neve Campbell), they’ve got a couple of
too-cute kids, and his line of work is assessing security concerns for
skyscrapers. He and his family are residing at the Pearl, a two hundred plus
story beast of an ultramodern tower in Hong Kong, as he consults on the
building design for his employers, and of course this being an action film, and
since it’s ripping off Die Hard, it doesn’t take long for terrorists to
show up and turn things into, well, a towering inferno.
Rawson Marshall Thurber wrote and directed this. He’s done
comedy work before, most recently the film Central Intelligence, also
with Johnson. This is the first time he’s done an action thriller. The script
borrows liberally from more than one genre. The Die Hard theme of
terrorists taking control of a confined space certainly applies. But so too are
things like employers not taking legitimate concerns seriously, authorities
jumping to conclusions, and ultimately life and death peril. And where Die
Hard succeeds is in that we feel John McClane is believable and mortal;
Sawyer, on the other hand, gets written in such a way that doesn’t feel
believable, that’s over the top. This is Thurber desperately trying to hide the
fact that his story is derivative behind a whole lot of overblown and over the
top plot devices.
Disaster films are mined for their effect- a fire high in a
very high building was already done to good effect with The Towering Inferno
back in the day. The script plays to some of the same stereotypes typical of
that genre, all while ignoring basic rules of physics. I mean seriously…
there’s what we can best describe as the money shot of the whole film, and in
short it is not possible. It’s a matter of defying things like gravity
and physics and trajectory and fundamental reality. Not that it stops your average action
thriller from ignoring such realities- insanely impossible stunts have kept Tom
Cruise pretending he’s still twenty five years younger than he is in the latter
half of the Mission Impossible series, after all.
Thurber as a director is more competent in that role. He can
reasonably handle action, even if it feels over the top and violating the rules
of gravity. A lot of the production values are CGI and FX- you’re not literally
going to suspend an actor that high above anything, but things look realistic
enough. It does have a vertigo inducing effect at times, which is appropriate
given how tall this building is supposed to be. Thurber’s style handles the
conventions of the genre decently enough- moments of sheer terror in between
creeping down dark corridors and enclosed spaces, the desperate fights for
survival, and so on, but it doesn’t change the fact that the film still feels
derivative.
This is one of those cases where the cast is, for the most
part, better than the writing gives them. Chin Han, who I’ve only seen in a
supporting role in The Dark Knight, has a supporting role as Zhao Long
Ji, the developer who’s hired Sawyer. He’s blasé about the concerns brought up,
and hiding a secret or two himself. It’s reluctantly that he’s drawn into the
action, but the actor gives the role a certain stoicism that at least works.
Pablo Schreiber turns up as Ben, Will’s slighty shifty buddy. And
British-Aussie actor Noah Taylor ramps up the sleazeball angle as an
underwriter, Pierce, whose presence in the film just feels creepy.
Of course in a film like this, you need an antagonist,
otherwise it’s just Building On Fire, News At Eleven, Now Back To Men’s Curling In
Progress. Which would make for a boring movie. The problem here is in the
writing, because the villain, Kores Botha, is no Hans Gruber. Played by Danish
actor Roland Moller, the character chews the scenery, menaces the innocent, and
wrecks havoc. He’s the required Euro-trash thug with an agenda. The actor’s
probably better than the material gives him to work with, but the material at
hand just makes him the villain-du-jour and doesn’t give us a reason to find
him compelling.
Neve Campbell, best known for Party Of Five and the Scream
franchise, gets to play the requisite damsel sort of kind of in distress as
Will’s life Sarah. Filling in the part of Bonnie Bedelia’s Holly (minus the marital
estrangement) from the first Die Hard, Sarah finds herself and her
children in peril throughout the film, either from gun toting Eurotrash or a
burning building, and while part of that means she’s in peril, she’s capable of
fending for herself too. Campbell makes the most of the role as a mother
protecting her kids in the midst of peril (the Die Hard franchise waited
to put the kids into peril until they were grown up), and at least the dynamic
between she and Johnson feels believable.
Johnson as an actor has the gift of a good sense of comedic
timing, a gruff, grouchy demeanour, and stage presence. He’s interesting to
watch, though here the role is over the top. In the last few years his films
have included playing a Greek demigod in Hercules, putting up with Zac
Efron (for which he should have been paid double just for the irritation) in Baywatch,
wasting time in some of those Fast And Furious films, tangling with
mutated beasts in Rampage, and surviving the ultimate earthquake in San Andreas. Now we find him pitted against the world’s tallest imaginary building.
While the character is rendered mortal- losing a leg will do that- it still
doesn’t feel as human as, well, John McClane always felt. That’s more to the
fault of the writer than the actor. Johnson makes do with what he’s given,
wavering between seriousness and the occasional quip.
So Skyscraper pretty much takes the cake as the Big Dumb Summer Movie of 2018. It’s
entertaining enough in its own way, but it’s derivative and over the top, and
does things over the course of storytelling that defy logic. There are
plotholes big enough to fit a skyscraper in, and it just leaves you with two
general impressions- first, that the director needs to work from the scripts of
others and the studio needs to keep a close rein on him, and second… just how
ridiculous was that whole thing?
Love the last photo the best !
ReplyDeletecheers, parsnip
It's accurate. There's no way he's jumping off that crane and doing anything but falling hundreds of feet to the ground.
DeleteI really wanted to see this because, well, it's The Rock, and because I love disaster movies. The Towering Inferno is still one of my favorites. (I will probably skip Trump: The Movie, because, disaster or not, well, it's Trump.)
ReplyDeleteAfter reading your review, however, I think I'll wait until this one is available on digital.
I had my share of eye rolls.
Delete"Die Hard on The Towering Inferno" was exactly the comment I made when I saw the first trailer. Sorry, but they're trying to remake "The Towering Inferno", without Irwin Allen or a John Williams score? I don't think so.
ReplyDeleteAt least they're not remaking the Airport movies.
DeleteSomehow I haven't even heard of this one.
ReplyDeleteI didn't look at last week's numbers- this post is more than a week old- but I expect the film's disappeared or is in the process of doing so this weekend.
Delete"Building On Fire, News At Eleven, Now Back To Men’s Curling In Progress." Made me laugh out loud!
ReplyDeleteIt seemed appropriate!
DeleteThis seems like an awesome movie! I like all the photos.
ReplyDeleteThanks for looking in.
DeleteHave to agree with Petrea's comment above--got a good laugh at the back to curling comment :) Didn't find myself drawn to this one much, I must admit!
ReplyDeleteIt pretty much came and went at the theatres.
Delete