Faith Can Move Mountains... But Dynamite Works Better
Showing posts with label Robin Hood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robin Hood. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

A Day In The Life Of A Dog

It is time once again for the point of view of the dog and the cat. As always, I begin with the hound...


7:26 AM. Waking up at home. Slept exceedingly well. Dreamed of chasing my tail... and finally catching it.


7:28 AM. A quick look outside. Hmmm, more snow. I was under the impression that spring was supposed to be in the air sometime this month, but apparently not.


7:31 AM. The human comes downstairs. I enthusiastically wag my tail in greetings. Hello, human!


7:34 AM. I have been provided with a bowl of kibbles for breakfast by the human. Thanks, human!


7:35 AM. Have finished wolfing down my breakfast. It was yummy!


7:46 AM. Enjoying the smells of frying bacon for the human’s breakfast. Doing my mooching sad eyes thing.


7:47 AM. The human has put a slice of bacon down onto a plate for me. Yum yum yum!


7:51 AM. Out the door for a morning run. See you later, human!


7:59 AM. Running through snowy fields, barking my head off! Woof woof woof!


8:04 AM. Well, this is at least one sign of spring... the creek in the woods is free of ice. Dare I splash around for a bit?


8:06 AM. Boy, that water’s cold enough to really wake you up. And put hair on your chest, if I’ve got the human expression right. That expression doesn’t make much sense, if you ask me, and of course you are asking me, but between you and me, there’s a lot about humans that don’t make sense. That said, I like them anyway.


8:09 AM. Okay, it didn’t occur to me before, but my splashing around in the water has gotten my fur a wee bit wet. Now, that’s not too much of a problem, I mean, after all, it’s not that cold out today, but the problem starts when I get home and the human applies the Towel of Torment to me. What is it about the nature of the dog that we so often give in to impulse without thinking things through? Oh, I know... impulse is fun.


8:13 AM. Stopping to see Spike the Magnificent, Tormentor of Squirrels. Hello, Spike!


8:14 AM. After greetings in the customary doggie manner, Spike and I compare notes on sightings of the enemy. The squirrels have been quite active raiding bird feeders. They must be getting anxious for the spring to come. And if they’re anxious, they might make mistakes. And if they make mistakes, they can get caught in the open. And if they get caught in the open... that’s when we can get them. And then, and only then... vengeance will be ours!


8:19 AM. Spike and I agree to keep each other updated on further sightings of the enemy through barking. See you later, Spike!


8:25 AM. Passing by the property of that cranky cat. I pause to have a look at things. Hmmm, there she is inside on a window sill. Should I go say hello? Would that be the wise thing to do? Or would it be the impulsive thing to do? Well, as long as she’s on the inside and I’m on the outside, it would at least be the fun thing to do. And always count on a dog to do the fun thing. 


8:27 AM. The cat has taken note of my presence on the property and is now up on her feet, hissing madly and cursing me through the window. Hello, cat! It’s me! Loki, Annoyer of Mailmen and Chewer of Slippers!


8:29 AM. Wagging my tail before the window while the cat hisses at me. Oh, come on! Why can’t we be friends? Fine, I’ll go. I mean, honestly, you bark at a cat while she’s sleeping on the porch just one time, and they never forgive you. Mind you, I’ve pulled that trick on her a total of seven times, but who’s counting?


8:43 AM. Back home. Barking to alert the human to my return. 


8:44 AM. The human has let me in, but is subjecting me to the Towel of Torment. You know, human, the smell of a wet dog is not as bad as you make it out to be. 


12:09 PM. Waking up from my nap just in time for lunch.


12:13 PM. I have successfully mooched a ham sandwich from the human. Yum yum yum!


6:06 PM. Watching the human while she’s making dinner. It smells good, that’s for sure.


6:32 PM. Dinner with the human. She’s cut up some nice chunks of lamb for me. Tastes good. I don’t know why, but she’s having Brussel sprouts with her lamb. Humans can be pretty weird at times, if you ask me.


8:32 PM. Barking out into the darkness for no reason whatsoever. It's a dog thing.


11:45 PM. The human is off to bed after watching the last of the local news. Weather forecasters are calling for more snow for the next few days. Well, think of it this way, human. Spring will get here eventually. Maybe in a few more weeks. Maybe in July. Maybe August. Just in time for winter to start coming back in September. Wouldn’t it be fun if we saw our first snowstorm of the latter part of the year on the Labour Day weekend?

Saturday, January 16, 2016

A Farewell To One Of The Greats


“Wait a minute. Robin Hood steals money from my pocket, forcing me to hurt the public, and they love him for it? That’s it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, and call off Christmas.” ~ The Sheriff of Nottingham, Robin Hood Prince Of Thieves

“Marianne Dashwood would no more think of me than she would of you, John.” ~ Colonel Brandon, Sense And Sensibility


“Some men are born in the wrong century. I think I was born on the wrong continent. Oh, by the way, you’re fired.” ~ Elliot Marston, Quigley Down Under

“I am an exceptional thief, Mrs. McClane. And since I’m moving up to kidnapping, you should be more polite.” ~ Hans Gruber, Die Hard

“The Irish people established the Irish republic. It can only be disestablished by the Irish people.” ~ Eamon de Valera, Michael Collins


“Well, I say we get drunk, because I’m all out of ideas.” ~ Metatron, Dogma

“Weasley’s wand causes devastation with the simplest spells. We’ll be sending Potter to the hospital wing in a matchbox.” ~ Severus Snape, Harry Potter & The Chamber Of Secrets


“I get stage fright and gremlins in my head saying:  you’re going to forget your lines.” ~ Alan Rickman

“I am the character you are not supposed to like.” ~ Alan Rickman

“What’s interesting about the process of acting is how often you don’t know what you’re doing.” ~ Alan Rickman


It’s been a week for the deaths of the famous. It began with the news that David Bowie had passed away, with his final album being his farewell to the world in a way that most people didn’t know until after the fact. And then on Thursday came the news of the death of one of my favourite actors, the great stage and screen actor Alan Rickman.


Most North Americans were first introduced to him through Die Hard, but the actor had a long resume before that. Born in a working class British family, he got into drama in school, eventually attending the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art. The stage followed, including Shakespeare, experimental, and repertory theatre. He got cast as the villainous Hans Gruber in Die Hard after his stage work got the attention of producer Joel Silver, and the film exposed him to a wider audience. Writer Steven de Souza has said that he wrote the script as if Gruber was the protagonist, which is a fair view. It can be said that you can look at the film as if Gruber’s the hero, trying to get a difficult job done while this annoying cop runs around getting in his way. It was Rickman’s first feature film, and what a role it was- the ruthless, clever leader of a gang, charming in his own way, and he got so many of the best lines.


Rickman made a big impression with that first villain, and there were others to follow. Quigley Down Under featured him in a Western set in 19th century Australia, playing a vicious ranch owner. He followed that with a more sympathetic role as a ghost in the fantasy romantic drama Truly, Madly, Deeply (I read a comment the other day wondering if Rickman’s ghost is going to be haunting Juliet Stevenson for a few months). And then along came another great villainous film role for the actor.


Robin Hood Prince Of Thieves (aka the one with the lead actor not able to maintain an English accent) saw Rickman cast as the Sheriff of Nottingham, and he’s the best part of the film, a pleasure to watch as he chews the scenery, storms about with the best lines, and just comes across as though he’s having a ball being so nasty.  His Sheriff is pure and unadulterated evil, malevolent, and ill tempered, suggesting that carving out an enemy’s heart with a spoon is better because it’ll hurt more, abusing his staff, and killing his cousin without a second thought. Throughout the film, as nasty and despicable a character as he is, you can’t help but enjoy watching him- Rickman takes the character and makes it his own.


Contrast that with another role, then, as Colonel Brandon in the 1995 adaptation of Sense And Sensibility. Jane Austen’s novel had been adapted before, and this version by director Ang Lee featured Rickman with Emma Thompson, Kate Winslet, Hugh Grant, and a strong supporting cast. Where some of Rickman’s previous roles had been villainous or Machiavellian, Brandon is the opposite: soft spoken, inherently decent, principled, a man of integrity. The character fit in well with the others, and Rickman’s performance gives the character a lot of humanity. He gives complexity and dry humour as well in his performance as Eamon de Valera, the Irish radical turned president in Michael Collins opposite Liam Neeson. That humour was also in play for his role as Harry in Love Actually.


It is a series that perhaps will have the longest impact for Rickman’s career- the Harry Potter films. He was cast as the pivotal professor of magic Severus Snape, seemingly that teacher we all hope we never get. Snape stalks through the films growling and sneering at his students, removing points from their houses, sending them to detention for seemingly no reason at all, and coming across like a Goth who never got past being a Goth. While on occasion he is seen to do things for the greater good, Snape generally occupies an antagonistic role to the main character through most of these films- he and young Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) have a mutual dislike that started for Snape with Harry’s father, who the boy reminds him of.


And yet he’s not the villain. Despite being thoroughly cranky and seeming to vent a good deal of hostility on one student in particular and his friends by association, and despite hanging around with the wrong people on too many occasions, Snape’s motives aren’t revealed until the last act of the book series and the movies. And it’s such a marvellous revelation, because it takes this antagonist and shows him to be a hero. A very human hero with flaws, but a hero nonetheless. J.K. Rowling had it in mind from the start, and it really works.


It turns out that when Rickman was cast for the first film, before the last of the books had even been published, he was let in on the eventual revelation, so you can imagine he played to that in his approach to Snape. He glowers and glares, seems as if he’s been in a bad mood for thirty years, and seems a perpetual outsider. And yet he conceals his true feelings so well that when you finally see his memories unveil his motivation, it’s a catharsis for the character and the audience.


There are a couple of Snape moments through the films that particularly stand out for me. First of course is late in the final film when we see his memories, and we see his heartbreak as he holds the body of Lily, the only woman he ever loved. Rickman played that moment perfectly, and we feel a sense of compassion and empathy for a man we’ve spent several films booing and hissing at. The other is a much more humourous moment in Harry Potter & The Goblet Of Fire featuring whispered conversations between students working in a study hall. Snape never says so much as a word, merely lingering in the background, glaring at students on occasion. By the scene’s end, he walks up right behind Harry and Ron (Rupert Grint), adjusts his sleeves while they’re continuing to prattle on... and cuffs them both. It’s a hilarious moment, something that always gets a grin out of me.


Through a lot of his feature work, he could always come across as gruff, cranky, and not the sort of person you’d want to get annoyed at you, but those were the characters more than anything else; many have been paying tribute to him in the last couple of days and talking about his sense of humour, warmth, and his creative spirit. He died in the company of his family and friends after a battle with cancer, but has left a rich legacy behind. I think Emma Thompson’s remark about him is most fitting: “he was, above all things, a rare and unique human being and we shall not see his like again.”

A life well lived. Thank you, Alan, for giving us wonderful performances and characters. You’re one of a kind.

Monday, October 20, 2014

The Five Hoods: A Devilish Saxon Scoundrel

Some links before we get things started. Yesterday having had been a Sunday, our joint blog had a Snippet Sunday post. Krisztina had tips for caramel tipped apples and Hallowe'en party food. Shelly had lost chapters to deal with. Lorelei wrote about witches. And the Whisk had this to say about unusual angel food cake.

And now for the last of my series of reviews on Robin Hood...


“Yes, of course we could do as you suggest. But the poacher will still have his eyes, so he can poach again.” ~ Sir Miles Folcanet

“You’re so handsome when you’re angry.” ~ Marian

“Let’s settle this on a coin toss. Heads I win, tails Harry loses.” ~ Robin Hood


Every once in awhile, two movies come out within a few months of each other with similar themes or subjects. Such was the case in 1991, when two movies about Robin Hood were released. Prince of Thieves got the lion’s share of the attention, while a British film simply called Robin Hood got overlooked. Its cinematic release was confined to Europe and other overseas locations. And yet it’s the better of the two, with my personal favourite interpretation of the title character. John Irvin, who had already directed the BBC version of Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, came on board as director in a story that emphasized the tensions between Saxons and Normans and presented an actor who brought the right measure of a charming scoundrel to the role.


The film opens in an England after the Crusades. Richard the Lionheart is absent from the lands, and his brother John (Edward Fox) is trying to consolidate power. We first meet a poacher named Much (Danny Webb) being run down by soldiers. He is saved by a local Saxon earl, Sir Robert Hode (Patrick Bergin) and his friend Will Scarlett (Owen Teale). Robert tells the pursuing party that he has no objection to Much hunting his deer on his land, and releases him. The leader of the party, a cruel Norman named Sir Miles Folcanet (Jurgen Prochnow), demands that he apologize in person at the court of his Norman feudal lord, Baron Roger Daguerre (Jeroen Krabbe).

Robert and Daguerre are friends, and Daguerre is pragmatic, suggesting that Robert just swallow his pride, apologize to Folcanet, and that will be the end of it. Robert also happens to have something of a spark with Marian, Daguerre’s niece, played by Uma Thurman; she’s engaged to marry Folcanet. Robert’s apology goes awry when Folcanet pushes it further though, and Robert quickly finds himself insulting his Norman hosts, declared an outlaw, and must fight his way out of the castle with the help of Will. It doesn’t take long after that before the two fall in with the outlaws of Sherwood, including Little John (David Morrissey), Friar Tuck (Jeff Nuttall), the treacherous Harry (Alex Norton), and Much, who doesn’t bat an eye when Robert is introduced as Robin Hood. And so the band of outlaws find themselves taking up arms to resist the Normans.


Irvin adapted the screenplay by Sam Resnick and John McGrath, which places stronger emphasis on the differences between Saxons and Normans in the era than other films had. The classic The Adventures Of Robin Hood had looked at that theme to some degree, but not too much, and Prince Of Thieves avoided it. In this case, it’s very much front and center, with Normans being still seen as the invading conquerors, disliked by the local Saxons, who resent being second class in their own homelands. The outlaws aren’t entirely altruistic in their motivations as to giving money to the poor; it’s more done in a realistic understanding that doing so is the best way to prevent people from giving them up to the authorities. The story also weaves in themes like justice, strained friendships, romance, pride, arrogance, nobility and the common man, and equal treatment under the law. It’s a grittier world, darker and more medieval, a reminder that the time could be a dangerous one, and Irvin shoots the film in that manner.


Much of the filming was done on location in England and Wales, and the countryside looks very British. Irvin also deliberately went for a washed out, almost black and white look through most of the film; colours are muted, and there’s a sense of bleakness and foreboding to the way the film is shot. It comes as refreshing, then, in the closing moments of the film that the sun finally comes out, and colours come into themselves, a wise touch by the director. Irvin also has a good handle on filming action, managing larger crowds of fighting adversaries and the one on one action of duels. He particularly gets creative in how those duels get staged.

The costuming and props look as medieval as the settings. You see that both in the clothing of common folk and the rich linens and attire of the wealthy. It comes across in the armour and the technology of the era, so even though the crew was not working with the larger budget of Prince Of Thieves, it still feels very much of its time, lending authenticity to the production.


The cast is largely of British or Irish origins, though there’s a bit of a continental influence in certain characters. Edward Fox gets a cameo as Prince John, touring the lands to raise taxes. He plays the part as other actors have done before and since: a vain, self absorbed, sneering man who holds others in contempt. Alex Norton turns up as Harry, a member of the band who is particularly hostile to Robin and Will from the start. He snarls and bites at every opportunity, playing the role as a greedy, backstabbing traitor who thinks nothing of betraying those around him.


David Morrissey is an interesting choice as Little John. He’s softer spoken than most actors who have taken on the role, more thoughtful in what he has to say. He’s done a lot of stage, television, and film work as an actor; American television audiences might know him best as The Governor in The Walking Dead series. The writer, actor, and activist Jeff Nuttall plays Friar Tuck as many have before: a priest given to drink, boisterous in character, but also with a very clear sense of right and wrong. There’s a darkly funny moment late in the film when he and a number of the outlaws confront a dying adversary, and he proclaims: “welcome to hell.” Considering the way the outlaws look at that moment, it’s entirely appropriate. Owen Teale is a good choice for Will Scarlett, who in this case is the archer’s best friend and gets caught up in his friend’s misadventures. He plays Will as loyal to a fault, courageous, and a man who still believes in his country and wants it back.


The film changes things around with the traditional adversaries; instead of a Sheriff of Nottingham and a Sir Guy of Gisbourne, we get original creations with different relationships to the outlaws. One of them is sympathetic, the other is not. Jurgen Prochnow is unsympathetic as the Sir Guy influenced character Sir Miles Folcanet. He’s played various villains, antagonists, and complicated characters in films like Air Force One, The Da Vinci Code, and Das Boot. His character is vindictive, arrogant, and petty, a man easily enraged who takes every perceived slight personally (it doesn't help that Robin re-opens the same wound, literally). Folcanet is supremely self absorbed, and tends to behave like you might expect a rattlesnake to act. Prochnow brings all of these qualities to his performance, and the end result is a very good villain.

Baron Daguerre is more complicated, taking the traditional role of the tax collecting sheriff, but the story gives him more depth as a man torn between two people. He’s more sympathetic, pragmatic in nature. Early on we see that he and Robert are old friends, and Daguerre seems genuinely eager to see both Saxon and Norman get along with each other and move forward as one people. He’s placed into a position where he must hunt old friends, where he finds himself on the opposing side. Jeroen Krabbe, who was so good in films like Immortal Beloved and The Fugitive, plays this sense of division and sympathy in the character in just the right way.


Uma Thurman was a very good choice for Marian. When we first meet her, she’s a bit distant; Robin must get to know her first, and the audience with him, even if we already know where things will end up. She plays the role as a woman with strong opinions, giving her a courageous, impulsive streak. Her Marian is radiant, bold, even aggressive, and very much a feminist in her thinking. She takes her fate into her own hands, makes decisions for herself, and even engages in her own fisticuffs. Perhaps no blow strikes harder though, than her words at a pivotal moment in the film, words that have the effect, almost, of castration on Folcanet. They’re humiliating words.... and they leave the audience smiling. It also helps that she has great chemistry with her leading man as they share the screen.


Patrick Bergin comes from Irish stock, and his work at this period included the monstrous ex-husband of Julia Roberts’ character in Sleeping With The Enemy and the leader of the Irish terrorists making Harrison Ford’s life hell in Patriot Games. More of his work since has been done in the British isles, though international audiences might recall him more recently from Ella Enchanted, in which he played Sir Peter. He’s ideally cast as Robert/ Robin, playing the part as a man of principle and pride, giving the character the right balance of the devilish scoundrel and charming outlaw. There's a glint of the rascal in his eyes and an amused smile from time to time, just as you'd expect of the character. Robin finds himself cast out more because he doesn’t want to swallow his pride, but it’s not a pride that crosses over into arrogance; it’s a firm pride in himself and his people as Saxons. Yet even cast out, he comes into his own, believing in justice and in hopes for a better land. He emerges as a natural leader, handy in a fight, and the sort of man who uses psychology as a weapon just as easily as he does a sword and a quiver of arrows. Bergin’s take on the character still stands as my favourite interpretation of the legendary outlaw. He’s a rogue, but such a compelling rogue.


Robin Hood might not have gotten the notice that its counterpart got in 1991, but it is the much better of the two films, taking itself more seriously, feeling more authentic as it takes on themes in a full way that have never really been explored before in a Robin Hood film. It has a particularly nasty villain, a sympathetic antagonist, and a supporting cast that inhabit their roles in the best of ways. And it has a leading pair of actors playing their characters as two people who genuinely like each other even as they’re falling for each other.